|
Media's "Go-To" Man on Religion in Public Schools Has Confict of Interest |
|
|
|
|
About the Bible Literacy Project
|
By Nancy Manno, co-host of the radio talk show 'In Great Company' Tuesday March 27, 6:00 am ET LINWOOD, N.J., March 27 /PRNewswire/ -- Freedom Forum First Amendment Center Senior Scholar, Charles Haynes, the news media's "go-to" man on religion in education, is not qualified to speak on legal Constitutional issues and Haynes should recuse himself when discussing teaching Bible in public schools because of a conflict of interest due to his longstanding association with the Bible Literacy Project, which is marketing a textbook to public schools. Haynes, who is often called by the news media to give expert opinion on the Constitutional issues of teaching religion in public schools, lacks the formal training of a lawyer and does not hold a law degree, yet he has interpreted for the media how the legal framework of the separation of church and state applies to the public schools. Haynes' background as a former employee of Americans United For Separation of Church and State and his close association with the American Civil Liberties Union and the Communitarian Network undoubtedly have shaped his viewpoint on religion in the public square. Haynes' true colors show in his written works. In "When the Government Prays No One Wins," Haynes infers that the National Day of Prayer should be illegal. Haynes wrote "The Relationship of Religion to Moral Education in the Public Schools," a manifesto of religion in public schools for the Communitarian Network, which Joseph Farah of WorldNetDaily describes as "a new form of Communism for people who believe in God." Haynes also writes educational documents for the Council On Islamic Education. In addition, Haynes authored "Public Schools and Sexual Orientation: A First Amendment Framework," which is endorsed by the radical Gay Lesbian Straight Education Network. Activist ACLU attorney, Oliver Thomas and Haynes coauthored "Finding Common Ground: A First Amendment Guide to Religion and Public Education," where Haynes gives his legal interpretations, which no doubt have been filtered through his coauthor. Haynes has been endorsed by Hartley Films, a division of The Temple of Understanding, which tries to move New Age videos into the public schools. Titles currently offered by the Hartley Film Foundation include "Buddhism: the Path to Enlightenment," "Hinduism and the Song of God," "Requiem for a Faith (Tibetan Buddhism)," "Taoism and Trip to Awareness: A Jain Pilgrimage to India." Further, Haynes is a board member of the Pluralism Project, and serves alongside a Wicca Priestess. But Haynes' conflict of interest lies in his support of the Bible Literacy Project's (BLP) efforts to teach the Bible to public high school students using a textbook "The Bible and Its Influence." Haynes uses his position at the Freedom Forum First Amendment Center (formerly the liberal Gannet Foundation) to appear unbiased to the news media while he endorses and promotes the BLP textbook as a legally acceptable means of teaching the Bible in public schools. Haynes and the BLP partnered in developing the guidelines to which the textbook was written (The Bible and Public Schools: A First Amendment Guide), and Haynes is a contributor to the textbook. Haynes has called local school districts considering offering Bible classes and has implied a strong possibility that the texts will invite a legal challenge from the ACLU. Haynes then recommends in their place the BLP textbook. The textbook is supposed to be about the Bible, but some have suggested that it follows Haynes' ideology by casting doubt on faith principles of the Bible, placing Islam in a favorable light, suggesting that the Bible was used to justify communism, and by promoting the United Nations Education, Science and Cultural Organization, which uses literacy as a tool to sponsor homosexuality, abortion, and religious pluralism. |
|
|
Bible Literacy Project Corrections To Bible Textbook Are Non Sequitur |
|
|
|
|
About the Bible Literacy Project
|
By Wiley Drake, 2nd Vice President of the Southern Baptist Convention Dr. John Hagee, of Cornerstone Church in San Antonio, Tx., called "The Bible and Its Influence" "a masterful work of deception, distortion and outright falsehoods." Bible Literacy Project Communications Vice President Sheila Weber has claimed that "misrepresentations" about the textbook "The Bible and Its Influence" have been corrected. However, many of Hagees' strongest concerns remain unchanged. Page 29 reads "other origin stories tell of many gods who are created, etc." Hagee says this "plants the concept in the mind of children that polytheism is just as acceptable as monotheism, which is contrary to the Bible." Also unchanged is a Bible quotation from an interpretation by Dr. Robert Alter, an endorser of and contributor to the textbook, saying God created the world "out of welter and waste." Hagee contends this leaves a "completely wrong" impression of the creation account. Hagee says the unchanged phrase on page 34 promotes polytheism: "By contrast, some traditions and philosophies see humans as no more or less sacred than other living creatures." Below is just a sampling of some of the troubling passages in "The Bible and Its Influence" that remain unchanged: - "Job is one of the most difficult books in the Bible in that it provides no clear cut moral or answer to Job's situation." (page 161)
- "God's help comes with strings attached – commandments or laws that the Israelites must obey in order to keep faith." (page 72)
- "The Lord blessed the latter days of Job more than his beginning.' [Job 42:12] This ending, though pleasing in some ways, has failed to satisfy various readers over the centuries." (page 160)
- "It is always good to remember not to try to apply current standards to the biblical accounts." (page 50)
- "Many students although aware of good and evil, have not thought deeply about it. In the Judeo-Christian tradition, God is considered to be good, all knowing and all powerful. Yet this view presents a problem." (page 163)
- "Gideon won the battle by a bit of trickery." (page 81)
- "The pattern of family trickery and deceit continues." (page 56 speaking of the family of Abraham)
- "American writer and reporter Lincoln Steffen's 1926 defense of Leninist (Communist) politics was called ‘Moses in Red.'" (page 65)
The text's dialectic method of questioning faith is reinforced on page 13 where it claims William Tyndale, translator of the Bible, "coined such phrases as 'Let there be light,' 'My brother's keeper,' and more. Teachers are instructed to "Devote particular attention to the phrases coined by Tyndale." This creates doubt over the true author of the Bible. Tyndale only translated the Bible, but the Bible Literacy Project implies that he was the one coining the phrases and writing the sentences. It is obvious why the National Council on Islamic Education has endorsed the guidelines to which the textbook was written. Teachers are instructed "to explain that the traditional Islamic reading of this story [ sic. Abraham and Isaac] (incorporated into the Qur'an) substitutes Ishmael for Isaac; Muslims see Ishmael as the oldest son and true successor to Abraham." In the revised student text, students read "Muslims honor Abraham as the first monotheist, worshipper of the one true God they call Allah." The text further states that "They [Muslims] prize the covenant God made with Hagar when she was abandoned in the wilderness" and quotes scripture supporting the statement. The text never mentions that the Bible states that Ishmael is not an heir to Abraham. As Dr. Hagee said about this textbook, "distortions, deceptions and falsehoods never produce moral, emotional, political or intellectual health." This is especially true when the Bible is compromised with liberal interpretations, justification of communism, and implications that God's chosen people were deceptive liars. Fact is, the Bible Literacy Project's revisions fall far short of allaying deep concerns about "The Bible and Its Influence." |
|
|
Seven Georgia School Districts Follow Recommendation of Legislature |
|
|
|
|
About Us
|
|
For immediate release
Date: March 29, 2007 Contact: National Council On Bible Curriculum In Public Schools Media Relations - (336) 272-2930 Seven Georgia School Districts Follow Recommendation of Legislature and Implement NCBCPS Bible Curriculum Greensboro, NC—March 29, 2007—Seven additional public school districts in Georgia have voted to adopt the National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public School’s (NCBCPS) elective Bible curriculum, The Bible in History and Literature, since the passage of a recent state law. In 2006, the Georgia General Assembly passed legislation encouraging public schools to offer an elective course that teaches both the Old and the New Testaments in the context of history and literature, using the Bible as the primary textbook. “We are pleased that many districts are already taking action to implement the recommendations of the legislature. State and local leaders are right to acknowledge that teaching about the Bible is an important component of any well-rounded education,” said Elizabeth Ridenour, NCBCPS President. “This curriculum meets all the applicable Constitutional guidelines and has assisted thousands of students in their pursuit of academic excellence and cultural literacy.” NCBCPS notes its curriculum has been implemented in over 380 school districts (1,500 high schools) in 37 states, since its launch in 1994. Approxmiately 190,000 students have already taken the elective course for credit. The curriculum utilizes the Bible as its textbook, and includes a 300 page teachers’ guide. The course has never been legally challenged because it presents the Bible objectively, as part of the regular program of public school education. The 2006 enabling legislation, authored by State Senator Tommie Williams (R), SS19, amended Georgia’s Quality Basic Education Act to make available an elective course in the history and literature of the Old Testament Era and another in the history and literature of the New Testament Era. NCBCPS’ The Bible in History and Literature fully complies with the Georgia law. The NCBCPS curriculum has been endorsed by The Foundation for Academic Excellence, Citizens for Excellence in Education, American Family Association, The Center for Reclaiming America, Eagle Forum, Dr. D. James Kennedy, David Barton of WallBuilders, and many other organizations and legal entities. For more information about this curriculum or how to have it implemented in your school district, visit www.bibleinschools.net or call 1-877-ON BIBLE. |
|
|
Yahoo's 'Go-To' Man on Religion in Public Schools is Unqualified |
|
|
|
|
About the Bible Literacy Project
|
Media's 'Go-To' Man on Religion in Public Schools, Charles Haynes, Unqualified, Has Conflict of Interest, By Nancy Manno, co-host of the radio talk show 'In Great Company' Tuesday March 27, 6:00 am ET LINWOOD, N.J., March 27 /PRNewswire/ -- Freedom Forum First Amendment Center Senior Scholar, Charles Haynes, the news media's "go-to" man on religion in education, is not qualified to speak on legal Constitutional issues and Haynes should recuse himself when discussing teaching Bible in public schools because of a conflict of interest due to his longstanding association with the Bible Literacy Project, which is marketing a textbook to public schools. For the full article to go Media's 'Go-To' Man on Religion in Public Schools |
|
|
Continuing Problems for the Bible Literacy Project |
|
|
|
|
About the Bible Literacy Project
|
|
RALEIGH, NC, Dec. 27 /Christian Newswire/ -- The following is released by Dennis L. Cuddy, PhD.:
On December 21, the Bible Literacy Project (BLP) responded to an article by Dr. Wiley Drake (Second Vice-President of the Southern Baptist Convention), which pointed out the error in the BLP's textbook, THE BIBLE AND ITS INFLUENCE, that states on page 238 that Jesus was born in Nazareth. The BLP said this would be "corrected" in the second printing of the textbook due January 2007. This acknowledgement of error by the BLP is interesting given that its website claims the textbook doesn't contain errors, a number of which I have described in previous articles. Let's see if the BLP's new textbook edition corrects "all" of the errors. And I wonder if the BLP will give all the schools using the current edition free new editions to make up for selling them texts with errors which they claimed weren't there? If you want to see the BLP's list of reviewers and consultants (who did not catch the errors before initial publication), look here. Among those listed is Dr. Charles Haynes, senior scholar at the First Amendment Center. However, given Dr. Drake's criticism of Dr. Haynes, the BLP now seems to be trying to distance itself from the latter. To read the entire article, please go to The Christian News Wire. (The article will open in a new window). |
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next > End >>
|
| Results 19 - 27 of 41 |